Holt Woods Scisciani LLP Blog

Issues: (1) Whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the UIM carrier’s litigation conduct after the named insured filed of a UIM? NO. (2) Whether the trial court erred in finding that the insured failed to prove evidence of damages to business or property which rendered her Consumer Protection Act (CPA) claim unsupportable as a matter of law? NO.

Issue: (1) Does ER 611(c) allow leading question on direct examination of an adverse party?
YES. (2) Is a separate motion to declare the adverse party as hostile required? NO. (3) Does ER
611(c) always permit the use of leading questions on cross-examination? NO.

Issues: (1) Whether tow trucks are considered cranes for purposes of the Department of Labor & Industries’ (L&I) regulations when they are used to hoist, lower, or horizontally move a suspended load. YES. (2) Whether L&I’s regulations prohibit crane operation in the entire area below an energized power line, not just crane operation within a certain distance from a line, when the crane is capable of reaching the power line. YES.

Issues: (1) Are pre-majority medical expenses (damages for medical expenses incurred prior to
one’s eighteenth birthday) only recoverable by a minor’s parents, since the parents are financially
responsible for the minor’s care and maintenance? NO. (2) Does the tolling provision in Wash.
Rev. Code § 4.16.190, which pauses the statute of limitations until a minor attains the age of
competency to bring claims on his or her own behalf, permit a parent or guardian to “bootstrap”
their own untimely claim to the minor’s claim? NO.



1500 Fourth Avenue, Suite 200

Seattle, WA 98101




101 SW Main Street, Suite 1605

Portland, OR 97204